Eight major companies, led by Google and Microsoft, are calling for tighter controls on surveillance of their customers’ data by governments worldwide.
Greg Russak‘s insight:
The next time we want to complain about government overreach, let’s make sure the conversation includes wholesale collection of data and, like him or not, accept that we have Edward Snowden to thank at least in part for our awareness of that overreach.
Programs such as PRISM begin modestly but turn dangerous when left unchecked.
Greg Russak‘s insight:
"The threat posed by PRISM and other programs is not what has been done with them but rather what could happen if they are permitted to survive. But this is not simply about the United States ending this program. The United States certainly is not the only country with such a program. But a reasonable start is for the country that claims to be most dedicated to its Constitution to adhere to it meticulously above and beyond the narrowest interpretation." – George Friedman, Stratfor
Let’s start by asking Obama’s detractors, especially those who ceaselessly characterize the size and overreach of “big government” as a threat to our democracy. How do you see Snowden? Is he a hero?
It doesn’t seem like a real stretch to assume that you’re happy on some level with what’s happening. Snowden’s leaks, after all, would seem perfectly timed to bolster the GOP’s insatiable appetite for embarrassing scandals that distract, obstruct, and disrupt any and everything Obama wants to accomplish in his second term.
Without Snowden (and particularly for those with short memories), we wouldn’t know what we know now about the scope of the NSA’s domestic spying. Surely Snowden’s actions warrant some sort of commendation for bravery and courage, don’t they?
If he is a hero, how do conservatives square that with how Bradley Manning has been treated?
Without Manning, we don’t know what we know now about what our government and military were doing in the Middle East and elsewhere. Is it only criminal to reveal secrets about the government when the GOP is running things? Are we supposed to implicitly and explicitly trust Republicans and the military but not the Democrats or the NSA?
Same sort of questions but from the opposite angle for liberals and all of Obama’s defenders.
Why isn’t Snowden a traitor and a criminal?
His heart might be in the right place, his intentions may have been good and righteous, and you may even see his actions as noble, but what about the act itself and the threats (real or imagined) his leaks create for national security? Isn’t leaking classified information at least criminal and maybe even treasonous? Can his intentions alone justify his actions? Do the ends justify the means?
Are all whistleblowers heroes? Can our government realistically function on our behalf on the global stage if they don’t spy and can’t have secrets?
Are we supposed to trust the government to, “…establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity” in a vacuum devoid of intelligence and information about what anyone is doing?
Snowden, like Manning, has literally put his life at stake. I, for one, am hoping that things turn out for Snowden to resemble Ellsberg more than Manning. The treatment of Bradley Manning will be another irreversible and permanent stain on the history of our country right next to drone strikes, torture, and the lies that took us into Iraq.
The Obama administration has already earned a reputation for secrecy and intolerance for whistleblowers. I suspect things are only going to get worse before they get better for citizens who want a more equitable balance between privacy, liberty, and security.
I also think it will be really interesting to see how the questions surrounding whistleblowing and domestic spying are incorporated into the 2014 campaign platforms on both sides.
Will the GOP try to have it both ways by applauding Snowden while condemning Manning?
Will there be a single Democrat with enough courage to condemn Obama for not doing more to protect our privacy?